This match could and should have gone 6-4 either way and I blame myself ( Alan Box) as referee of the 1st for part of the problem! unfortunately, I normally ask about the mis-rule before we commence and did not do so and so it was left to what is considered the "blatent" instance of calling a miss which was more or less a rule that is if the ball can be hit head on and missed then a miss is called. This was not the case and if I had to be honest would have resulted in a different result to this frame. Hopefully this explains my view? Alan Box
Answers on a postcard to
Alan Box |